the poetrysheet

whimsy, subversion, bowling

Number 491, April 23, 2004

Virgil (Publius Vergilius Maro, 70 B.C.-19 B.C.)

 


Christians should be taught that he who gives to a poor man, or lends to a needy man, does better than if he bought pardons.”

Martin Luther (1483-1546), #43, The Ninety-Five Theses


 

On the New Yorker: A letter to John Warner, columnist for The Morning News (http://www.themorningnews.org/)

 

About a month ago, I read Warner’s year-old “Among the ‘Unsavvy’” on the New Yorker’s change of fiction editor. Hopes were that the departure of Bill Buford and the entrance of Deborah Treisman would open the magazine again to new writers. Alas, it was not to be the case.

 

Warner proposed to take all the New Yorker unsolicited submissions for one month, about 5,000 submissions, and find one publishable work—create a contest of the New Yorker’s slushpile. (Read Warner’s column at: http://www.themorningnews.org/archives/opinions/among_the_unsavvy.php#002689)

 

Here is our correspondence:

 

Mr. Warner,

 

I just read your editorial on the Morning News, Jan. 29, 2003, finding it, of course, while attempting to unearth whom the fiction editor of the New Yorker is.

 

I'm glad I came across your piece. I've read the NYer time and again, and find it sometimes interesting, sometimes maddeningly elitist. Most recently, I've been reading the fiction closely, and like many other artists over the ages, I said to myself, "Gee, I can do that."

 

(I've noticed, however, recent NYer fiction tends toward having a clever trick over real writing power. And tricks, no matter how clever, are often cheap.)

 

I submitted a story to the NYer slushpile that would be better in its pages. I did it, of course, with the fatalism of an experienced writer and the same enthusiasm I buy a single lottery ticket when the jackpot gets to $27 million or multiples thereof. (I asked God, in a moment of desperation once when I was young, for $27 million. I figure I better pick up my end.)

 

Your article confirmed to me that the admonition (by implication) not to submit the story elsewhere while the magazine considers it is both arrogant on their part and stupid, should I comply, on mine.

 

So, did you receive any response either from the NYer or Ms. Treisman on your proposed contest. Having worked for a long time in magazine and book publishing and understanding something of the mindset of that world, I can't imagine you did.

 

Even so, you have gained a regular reader. I've read several of your columns from the archives. I will keep coming back.

 

Yours,

Patrick Dobson

journalist, freelance editor and writer

Kansas City, MO

-------

on 3/31/04 7:40 PM, John Warner wrote:

 

Patrick:

 

Nice of you to get in touch. Indeed, to hold one’s breath waiting for a response from the New Yorker is to risk a suffocating death. In truth, they publish nothing that doesn’t come through some kind of network or connection. It’s simply a reality of how they work.

 

After the article, Treisman made some public comments claiming that they really do read the slushpile, which led me to believe that she’d seen the piece and regretted some of her flippancy, but I haven’t heard from her directly. No word on them wanting to do the contest yet, but there is a version of it going on in the UK called Lit Idol that’s sponsored by one of the papers over there.

 

Fortunately the New Yorker is less and less powerful in terms of making careers in writing. It used to be the best path to success, but is hardly relevant for most of us.

 

Very pleased that you enjoyed the piece and I wish you luck in your writing endeavors.

 

John Warner

-----

Warner had quoted Treisman from an interview in a Book Magazine Q&A, which I excert here (read the whole interview at: http://www.bookmagazine.com/issue26/treisman.shtml):

 

Q: Have you ever rescued anything notable from the slush pile?

A: Someone who's submitting themselves directly to the fiction editor probably isn't all that savvy about publishing and probably not about writing either. Though I'm sure there are exceptions to that. Particularly in poetry. A lot of poetry comes from the slush pile, because poets don't have agents.

 

But also add another intriguing quote two paragraphs down from the above:

 

Q: Where do you look for new writers? You must spend a lot of time looking through smaller literary journals.

A: Most often if it's not from an agent, then it's coming from someone in the writing world who happens to have stumbled across a person of talent. I've tried going down to the sidewalk and just yelling for writers, but...

-----

Imagine that! Maybe writers Treisman would find “yelling” down the canyons of New York would be more savvy than a hard-working Rube like me?

 


 

landscaping

 

the new yard

gravel and rock

bare ground muddied

in recent rain

lays fertile in the mind

for dogwood, pink and white,

a pair of redbuds

either side of the drive,

a couple of brooding lilacs

up next to the house

 

out back, on the hill,

where the water has run

into the basement already

the mind has placed two apples,

a peach, and a fish pond

 

all this gardening, digging, hoeing,

mulching around roots,

smacking dust and soil

from knees of jeans

and crimps of skin

presupposes the pinoak,

now a sapling,

draping a hand over it all

 

a hand that only an old man

might remember he wanted to see

as he sits on a porch swing

under a broken gutter

before a house long in need of paint

in the shade of that tree

 


send short poems, short thoughts, fictions, or nonfictions to the poetrysheet, where whimsy, subversion, and watching minnows make their way upstream are our highest values


submit/identity/www.patrickdobson.com/red hot links

archive/contact/subscribe

 

all material copyright poetrysheet and personally recommended press, unless otherwise arranged with the authors. for information, contact rev. patrick dobson, 1132 e. 65th st., kansas city, mo, 64131, 816-333-7303.

 

www.brainbump.com

Where Jesus Actually

Does Something

SHIRTS

STICKERS

PUBS

www.brainbump.com

THE LEFT IS ALWAYS RIGHTEOUS